Key Takeaways
- Seller has no liability after asset transfer.
- Buyer’s recovery limited to the asset only.
- Higher risk for buyer, lower for seller.
What is Without Recourse?
Without recourse means transferring a financial asset or instrument without assuming ongoing liability if the asset defaults. The buyer’s recovery is limited strictly to the asset itself, unlike with recourse arrangements where the seller remains personally liable. This concept often appears in sales of receivables or loans, protecting the seller from future claims.
For example, endorsing a check without recourse means the endorser cannot be held responsible if the check bounces, shifting all risk to the holder.
Key Characteristics
Key traits define without recourse transactions and clarify risk distribution.
- Limited Liability: The seller or endorser disclaims personal responsibility beyond the transferred asset’s value.
- Risk Transfer: Buyer assumes full risk of non-payment or default, often reflected in pricing or fees.
- Common in Factoring: Businesses often sell invoices without recourse, transferring collection risk to the factor.
- Legal Protection: Prevents lawsuits against the seller for unpaid debts or defaults related to the asset.
- Collateral Bound: In loans, lenders without recourse can only seize pledged collateral, not pursue other borrower assets.
How It Works
In a without recourse agreement, you transfer ownership of a financial asset like an invoice or loan, explicitly disclaiming liability for its future performance. The buyer or lender accepts the asset “as is,” with no right to seek additional compensation beyond the asset’s value.
This arrangement shifts credit risk entirely to the buyer, often resulting in higher fees or stricter terms to compensate for potential losses. For example, non-recourse loans require lenders to rely solely on collateral, influencing loan structure and interest rates.
Understanding the obligation terms in your contracts is crucial to ensure clarity on who bears the risk and what remedies exist if defaults occur.
Examples and Use Cases
Without recourse is applied in various financial contexts to manage risk and liability.
- Airlines: Delta and American Airlines often use factoring arrangements where receivables are sold without recourse, transferring collection risk to factors.
- Invoice Factoring: Companies sell outstanding invoices to a factor without recourse, meaning if customers don’t pay, the factor absorbs the loss rather than the seller.
- Real Estate Loans: Non-recourse loans restrict lenders to foreclosing on the property only, common in commercial real estate financing to protect borrower’s other assets.
- Negotiable Instruments: Endorsing checks or promissory notes without recourse limits your liability if payers default.
Important Considerations
Without recourse limits your liability but places greater risk on the buyer, often leading to higher costs or stricter terms to compensate for that risk. You should carefully review contract language and understand how risk and obligations are allocated before entering such agreements.
Additionally, the nature of your assets and your industry may influence whether non-recourse arrangements are practical or beneficial. For those interested in low-risk investment vehicles, exploring best low-cost index funds or best dividend stocks can provide alternative approaches to managing risk and returns.
Final Words
Without recourse transfers limit your liability to the asset itself, shielding you from further claims if it underperforms. Review your contracts carefully and consult a professional to ensure the terms align with your risk tolerance and financial goals.
Frequently Asked Questions
'Without recourse' means the seller or endorser transfers an asset or financial instrument to the buyer without retaining any liability for non-payment or default. This limits the buyer's remedies to the asset itself and prevents pursuing the seller's other assets.
'Without recourse' limits the buyer or lender to recovering only the asset or collateral if the borrower defaults, with no claim against the seller's personal assets. In contrast, 'with recourse' means the seller or borrower remains personally liable, allowing the buyer or lender to pursue additional assets beyond the collateral.
Examples include endorsing a check without recourse, where the endorser isn't liable if the check bounces, and non-recourse loans, where lenders can only claim the collateral but cannot pursue the borrower's other assets if the loan defaults.
In a 'without recourse' loan, the lender assumes higher risk because they can only recover the collateral and cannot seek repayment from the borrower's other assets. This often results in stricter loan terms or higher interest rates to compensate for the increased risk.
'Without recourse' protects the borrower or seller by limiting their liability to the asset or collateral involved in the transaction. They are not personally responsible for any deficiency if the asset's value doesn't cover the owed amount.
Yes, endorsing a check 'without recourse' means the endorser is not legally responsible if the check bounces due to insufficient funds. The holder cannot sue the endorser for recovery, limiting legal claims to the check itself.
Yes, state laws play a significant role in classifying mortgages as recourse or non-recourse. For example, some states treat home loans as non-recourse, limiting lenders to foreclosing on the property without pursuing other assets.
With recourse debt forgiveness may trigger taxable income reported on Form 1099-C, while non-recourse debt typically treats foreclosure as a sale of collateral, which can have different tax consequences for the borrower.

